Fintech Rulemaking: Evidence from Middle East and Africa

Files

AcceptedcopyofChapterSubmissionforthePalgraveHandbookofFinTechinAfricaandMiddleEast._Daramola13.05.2024.pdf (487.43 KB)

Links to Files

https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-981-96-6143-5_19

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6143-5_19
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/39792

Collections

UMBC School of Public Policy
UMBC Student Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1142-1761

Date

2025-07-11

Type of Work

book chapters
postprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Daramola, Adebola A. “Fintech Rulemaking: Evidence from Middle East and Africa.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Fintech in Africa and Middle East, edited by Tsanis, K., Webb, H.C., Kaddour, A., David-West, O., 399–430. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6143-5_19.

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.

Subjects

Abstract

In recent times, there has been a flurry of fintech policymaking across the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region. This chapter studies fintech rulemaking processes across the MEA region. Earlier research has described responses to fintech as (a) Wait and See, (b) Test and Learn, (c) Innovation Facilitators (includes regulatory sandboxes, innovation hubs, and accelerators), and (d) Regulatory Laws and Reform. This chapter is about the regulatory reforms with theoretical foundation in policy diffusion and administrative process. The author extends an emerging scholarship on administrative process theory of central banking. The author asserts fintech policies began with initial guidance from multilateral development banks (World Bank, IMF, UNECA, UNCDF), global standard-setting bodies (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Financial Stability Board), regional organization (Arab Monetary Fund), and collaborative network (Alliance for Financial Inclusion). Over time, MEA nations developed their fintech-specific regulations.The author used a self-gathered private dataset of fintech rulemaking processes across the MEA region, the World Bank Global Fintech-enabling regulations database, and the World Bank’s Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance (GRG). From the data analysis, the author’s findings led to three conceptual frameworks: (i) solicitation, (ii) engagement, and (iii) custodianship.Solicitation refers to when financial regulators (central banks, securities regulators) ask for input from the public. Engagement could take any of these form cooperation and collaboration. It refers to activities that keep regulators and the public to interact as well as help improve fintech regulatory decision-making. Lastly, custodianship explores the prerogative role held by financial regulators to guard, protect, and maintain financial inclusion, stability, integrity, and protection (I-SIP) of the financial system.