Renewing the Energy Debate: How Campaign Framing Influences Environmental Attitudes
dc.contributor.advisor | Robinson, Carin | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Eager, Paige | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Kindahl, Eric | |
dc.contributor.author | Nagel, Madelyn | |
dc.contributor.department | Hood College Political Science and Global Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.program | Hood College Departmental Honors | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-28T19:57:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-28T19:57:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-28 | |
dc.description.abstract | Public opinion is an increasingly powerful source that shapes the world around us, particularly in a democracy. Therefore, it is critical that the public is informed and educated about current events and issues to make informed decisions. The technique of framing can influence people’s attitudes toward the environment, energy sustainability, and willingness to take pro-environmental action. In this paper, I examine how framing effects can shape public opinion on the environment, with a focus on renewable energy. How does framing affect environmental attitudes? How does framing affect hypothetical candidates' support? Using an experimental survey, I tested three framing conditions (economic, moral, and social) carefully crafted from keywords/phrases from the 2020 Democratic and Republican Party Platforms. The most effective way to discuss the environment is through an economic frame. In comparison, when discussing the environment in a political or electoral context, a social frame had the most effect. This study suggests that business leaders, activists, or community organizations should consider using an economic frame when addressing the environment. While a social frame would be most effective in an electoral or political context. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 33 pages | en_US |
dc.genre | Departmental Honors Thesis | en_US |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m200in-cwf4 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/27814 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | Renewable Energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Partisanship | en_US |
dc.subject | Framing Effects | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental Attitudes | en_US |
dc.subject | Candidate | en_US |
dc.subject | Public Opinion | en_US |
dc.subject | Framing Theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic Frame | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Frame | en_US |
dc.subject | Moral Frame | en_US |
dc.title | Renewing the Energy Debate: How Campaign Framing Influences Environmental Attitudes | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Renewing the Energy Debate- How Campaign Framing Influences Environmental Attitudes.pdf
- Size:
- 519.23 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Departmental Honors Thesis
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.01 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: