Mercury dynamics in groundwater across three distinct riparian zone types of the US Midwest

dc.contributor.authorG. Vidon, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorJ. Mitchell, Carl P.
dc.contributor.authorJacinthe, Pierre-André
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiaoqiang
dc.contributor.authorR. Fisher, Katelin
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T15:08:46Z
dc.date.available2025-01-08T15:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-04
dc.description.abstractAlthough the intense biogeochemical gradients present in riparian zones have the potential to affect mercury (Hg) cycling, Hg dynamics in riparian zones has received relatively little attention in the literature. Our study investigated groundwater filtered total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) dynamics in three riparian zones with contrasting hydrogeomorphic (HGM) characteristics (till, alluvium, outwash) in the US Midwest. Despite high Hg deposition rates (>16 μg m⁻²) in the region, median THg (<1.05 ng L⁻¹) and MeHg (<0.05 ng L⁻¹) concentrations were low at the study sites. Methylmercury concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) correlated to THg (R = 0.82), temperature (R = 0.55), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (R = 0.62). THg also correlated with groundwater DOC (R = 0.59). The proportion of MeHg in THg (%MeHg) was significantly correlated to temperature (R = 0.58) and MeHg (R = 0.50). Results suggest that HGM characteristics, the presence of tile drains, and the propensity for overbank flooding at a riparian site determined the extent to which stream water Hg concentrations influenced riparian groundwater Hg levels or vice versa. Differences in hydrogeomorphic characteristics between sites did not translate however in significant differences in groundwater MeHg or %MeHg. Overall, widespread Hg contamination in the most common riparian hydrogeomorphic types of the US Midwest is unlikely to be a major concern. However, for frequently flooded riparian zones located downstream from a potentially large source of Hg (e.g., concentrated urban development), Hg concentrations are likely to be higher than at other sites.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was partially supported by USDA-NIFA grant # 2009- 35112-05241 to P. Vidon, P. A. Jacinthe and M. E. Baker, and USGS-IWRRC grant # 06HQGR0084 to P. Vidon and C. Mitchell. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USGS or USDA. Additional funding was also provided to P. Vidon by grants from the Indiana Academy of Science, and Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis. Thanks are due to Mr Douglas Johnstone (WR site), Mr Jeffrey Phares (LWD site), and IndyParks, City of Indianapolis (SSNS site) for granting us access to the sites for the duration of the study.
dc.description.urihttps://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/em/c3em00254c
dc.format.extent11 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2re22-zze2
dc.identifier.citationG. Vidon, Philippe, Carl P. J. Mitchell, Pierre-André Jacinthe, Matthew E. Baker, Xiaoqiang Liu, and Katelin R. Fisher. “Mercury Dynamics in Groundwater across Three Distinct Riparian Zone Types of the US Midwest.” Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 15, no. 11 (2013): 2131–41. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00254C.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00254C
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/37182
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistry
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Center for Urban Environmental Research and Education (CUERE)
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en
dc.titleMercury dynamics in groundwater across three distinct riparian zone types of the US Midwest
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-0204

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
c3em00254c.pdf
Size:
847.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format