Implications of Rhetoric: A Newspaper Analysis of Immigration Policy
Permanent Link
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Davis, Cassie. “Implications of Rhetoric: A Newspaper Analysis of Immigration Policy.” UMBC Review: Journal of Undergraduate Research 22 (2021): 99–116. https://ur.umbc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/354/2021/04/URCAD-web-book.pdf#page=99
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Subjects
Abstract
This project examines nativism and racialized rhetoric surrounding Executive Order 13780 (Muslim ban) to identify parallels with immigration rhetoric and legislation in the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) and Operation Wetback (1954). This study is limited to 60 New York Times pieces – articles, editorials, and opinion pieces – and official legislative policies to identify incautious, racialized, and pejorative language. This study also examines scholarship on American nativism to provide a conceptual framework for how rhetoric categorizing migrants as criminal, amoral, or less-than-human serves to justify biased and inhumane treatment of these potential refugees and to encourage anti-immigrant sentiment among Americans.
