Community College Presidents' Understanding Of Spirituality As Part Of A Community College Institution
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Advanced Studies, Leadership, and Policy
Program
Doctor of Education
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
This item is made available by Morgan State University for personal, educational, and research purposes in accordance with Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Other uses may require permission from the copyright owner.
Abstract
This study explored how community college presidents understood spirituality as part of a community college institution. Using a purposive criterion sample, five community college presidents were interviewed in the natural setting of their individual colleges. The interviews took place over a thirteen month period of time. A phenomenological approach to data collection and analysis was used to elicit participants' understandings of spirituality as part of a community college. This approach included three rounds of semi-structured, open-ended interviews and interview questions designed to uncover the essence of essential meanings of how community college presidents understand spirituality as part of a community college. The conceptual framework for this study was based on three assumptions: 1) individuals have the ability to engage in, reflect upon, and construct their own meaning (Mezirow, 1991); 2) individual knowledge construction is related to the search for meaning and purpose (Tisdell, 2003); and 3) the search for meaning and purpose has been marginalized in the western academy (Shahjahan (2005, 2007). This study found that community college presidents viewed spirituality as part of a community college institution through the framework of six themes: 1) life experience and leadership, 2) reflective thought and deeper meaning, 3) definitions, 4) legal responsibilities and boundaries, 5) whole-person development, and 6) connecting the college and culture. Each president constructed his or her own definition of spirituality based on their life experience and worldview. All of the presidents agreed that spirituality was part of the community colleges they lead, but it is manifested in different ways. There was no disagreement that students should have opportunities to explore meaning, purpose, and spirituality while attending their institutions, but each president reported that spirituality should not be forced or otherwise imposed upon anyone at their college.