Addressing critiques refines global estimates of reforestation potential for climate change mitigation
| dc.contributor.author | Fesenmyer, Kurt A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Poor, Erin E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Terasaki Hart, Drew E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Veldman, Joseph W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fleischman, Forrest | |
| dc.contributor.author | Choksi, Pooja | |
| dc.contributor.author | Archibald, Sally | |
| dc.contributor.author | Armani, Mohammed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fagan, Matthew E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fricke, Evan C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Terrer, César | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hasler, Natalia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, Christopher A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ellis, Peter W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cook-Patton, Susan C. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-09T17:54:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-6-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Reforestation is a prominent climate change mitigation strategy, but available global maps of reforestation potential are widely criticized and highly variable, which limits their ability to provide robust estimates of both the locations and total area of opportunity. Here we develop global maps that address common critiques, build on a review of 89 reforestation maps created at multiple scales, and present eight reforestation scenarios with varying objectives, including providing ecosystem services, minimizing social conflicts, and delivering government policies. Across scenarios, we find up to 195 Mha (million hectares) are available (2225 TgCO₂e (teragrams of carbon dioxide equivalent) per year total net mitigation potential), which is 71–92% smaller than previous estimates because of conservative modeling choices, incorporation of safeguards, and use of recent, high-resolution datasets. This area drops as low as 6 Mha (53 TgCO₂e per year total net mitigation potential) if only statutorily protected areas are targeted. Few locations simultaneously achieve multiple objectives, suggesting that a mix of lands and restoration motivations will be needed to capitalize on the many potential benefits of reforestation., Reforestation is a key climate change mitigation strategy, but global maps of its potential are widely criticized. This study shows that addressing those critiques substantially refines estimates of the places with reforestation potential. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | K.A.F., E.E.P., D.E.T.H., P.W.E., and S.S.C.-P. were funded by the Bezos Earth Fund. J.W.V. was supported by USDA-NIFA Sustainable Agricultural Systems Grant 2019-68012-29819, USDA-NIFA McIntire-Stennis Project 1016880, and the National Science Foundation under award DEB1931232. F.F. and P.C. were funded by NASA grant 80NSSC22K1363, and F.F. acknowledges the receipt of a fellowship from the OECD Cooperative Research Programme: Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems in 2023. S.A. and M.A. were funded by Future Ecosystems for Africa in partnership with Oppenheimer Generations Research and Conservation. M.E.F. was funded by a NASA grant 80NSSC21K0297 and a Bezos Earth Fund grant to the World Resources Institute with a subgrant to the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. E.C.F. and C.T. were supported by the MIT Climate and Sustainability Consortium and the Government of Portugal through the Portuguese Foundation for International Cooperation in Science, Technology, and Higher Education. N.H. and C.A.W. were funded by a Bezos Earth Fund grant to the Nature Conservancy with a sub-grant to Clark University. We are grateful for the insights and review provided by Christina Kennedy, Johan Oldekop, and David Theobald during the development of our methods, and for cartographic advice provided by Chris Bruce. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59799-8 | |
| dc.format.extent | 13 pages | |
| dc.genre | journal articles | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m2gzhq-hwff | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Fesenmyer, Kurt A., Erin E. Poor, Drew E. Terasaki Hart, Joseph W. Veldman, Forrest Fleischman, Pooja Choksi, Sally Archibald, et al. “Addressing Critiques Refines Global Estimates of Reforestation Potential for Climate Change Mitigation.” Nature Communications 16, no. 1 (June 11, 2025): 4572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59799-8. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59799-8 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/39222 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Nature | |
| dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Faculty Collection | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.title | Addressing critiques refines global estimates of reforestation potential for climate change mitigation | |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dcterms.creator | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-9251 |
