From natural to sexual selection: Revealing a hidden preference for camouflage patterns

Thumbnail Image

Files

2023.09.27.559753v1.full.pdf (1.52 MB)

Links to Files

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.27.559753v1

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.559753
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/30957

Collections

UMBC Biological Sciences Department
UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Student Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-3852
 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-3829

Date

2023-09-29

Type of Work

journal articles
preprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Subjects

Abstract

Natural and sexual selection can be in conflict in driving the evolution of sexual ornamentation. Sexual selection favours detectability to potential mates, whereas natural selection penalises detectability to avoid predators. Focusing on signal efficiency rather than detectability, however, suggests that natural and sexual selection need not be antagonistic. Considerable evidence demonstrates that people prefer images that match the statistics of natural scenes, likely because they are efficiently processed by the brain. This “processing bias” suggests that background-matching camouflage can be favoured by natural and sexual selection. We conducted an online experiment and showed for the first time human preference for camouflaged stimuli. Because the underlying visual mechanisms are shared across vertebrates, our results suggest that camouflage patterns could serve as evolutionary precursors of sexual signals.