Conceptual Links between Landscape Diversity and Diet Diversity: A Roadmap for Transdisciplinary Research

Thumbnail Image

Files

biaa048.pdf (1.21 MB)

Links to Files

https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/70/7/563/5855870

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa048
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/19165

Collections

UMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-9251

Date

2020-06-24

Type of Work

journal articles
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Sarah E Gergel, Bronwen Powell, FrÉdÉric Baudron, Sylvia L R Wood, Jeanine M Rhemtulla, Gina Kennedy, Laura V Rasmussen, Amy Ickowitz, Matthew E Fagan, Erica A H Smithwick, Jessica Ranieri, Stephen A Wood, Jeroen C J Groot, Terry C H Sunderland, Conceptual Links between Landscape Diversity and Diet Diversity: A Roadmap for Transdisciplinary Research, BioScience, Volume 70, Issue 7, July 2020, Pages 563–575, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa048

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution 4.0 International

Subjects

Abstract

Malnutrition linked to poor quality diets affects at least 2 billion people. Forests, as well as agricultural systems linked to trees, are key sources of dietary diversity in rural settings. In the present article, we develop conceptual links between diet diversity and forested landscape mosaics within the rural tropics. First, we summarize the state of knowledge regarding diets obtained from forests, trees, and agroforests. We then hypothesize how disturbed secondary forests, edge habitats, forest access, and landscape diversity can function in bolstering dietary diversity. Taken together, these ideas help us build a framework illuminating four pathways (direct, agroecological, energy, and market pathways) connecting forested landscapes to diet diversity. Finally, we offer recommendations to fill remaining knowledge gaps related to diet and forest cover monitoring. We argue that better evaluation of the role of land cover complexity will help avoid overly simplistic views of food security and, instead, uncover nutritional synergies with forest conservation and restoration.