Direct flue gas capture for algae cultivation and subsequent valorization: evaluating life cycle emissions and costs

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Singh, Udayan, Farah Naaz, Troy R. Hawkins, et al. “Direct Flue Gas Capture for Algae Cultivation and Subsequent Valorization: Evaluating Life Cycle Emissions and Costs.” Sustainable Energy & Fuels 9, no. 16 (2025): 4392–403. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SE00329F.

Rights

This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain

Subjects

Abstract

Algae cultivation and processing is an important pathway under discussion within the broader CO₂ capture and utilization umbrella. Here, we discuss the results of a life-cycle analysis and techno-economic analysis of a pilot-scale photobioreactor that uses flue gas directly from natural gas or biogas combustion at 3–5% CO₂ concentration. The system requires minimal freshwater use as it has been successfully run with industrial wastewater and has a much smaller areal footprint compared with open pond cultivation. Introducing the flue gas directly to the photobioreactor avoids the need for CO₂ separation and pressurization, which is undertaken in many other algae cultivation systems. For the end-use of the biomass, the default case assumes conversion of algae to liquid fuels via hydrothermal liquefaction. The results indicate that the pilot-scale system has a higher cost, and comparable greenhouse gas emissions compared to pond-based systems, especially as the grid is anticipated to evolve to a lower carbon intensity. The costs of algae biofuel production range from $12–16 per GGE at the current pilot scale. Depending on whether the source of the carbon is fossil or biogenic, the net emissions are 68 g CO₂e per MJ and −4 g CO₂e per MJ respectively. If the marine algae species is used instead of the freshwater species, it offers an additional 16 g CO₂e per MJ carbon fixation in the form of calcium carbonate. The findings point to broadly desirable trends in GHG emissions and costs, while the discussion aims to shed light on areas that could further improve the scalability of the system.