Direct flue gas capture for algae cultivation and subsequent valorization: evaluating life cycle emissions and costs

dc.contributor.authorSingh, Udayan
dc.contributor.authorNaaz, Farah
dc.contributor.authorR. Hawkins, Troy
dc.contributor.authorWeinberg, Ed
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Sudhanya
dc.contributor.authorMroz, Robert
dc.contributor.authorOhri, Nidhi
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jingyi
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yi-Ying
dc.contributor.authorChen, Feng
dc.contributor.authorHill, Russell T.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yantao
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T18:15:05Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-25
dc.description.abstractAlgae cultivation and processing is an important pathway under discussion within the broader CO₂ capture and utilization umbrella. Here, we discuss the results of a life-cycle analysis and techno-economic analysis of a pilot-scale photobioreactor that uses flue gas directly from natural gas or biogas combustion at 3–5% CO₂ concentration. The system requires minimal freshwater use as it has been successfully run with industrial wastewater and has a much smaller areal footprint compared with open pond cultivation. Introducing the flue gas directly to the photobioreactor avoids the need for CO₂ separation and pressurization, which is undertaken in many other algae cultivation systems. For the end-use of the biomass, the default case assumes conversion of algae to liquid fuels via hydrothermal liquefaction. The results indicate that the pilot-scale system has a higher cost, and comparable greenhouse gas emissions compared to pond-based systems, especially as the grid is anticipated to evolve to a lower carbon intensity. The costs of algae biofuel production range from $12–16 per GGE at the current pilot scale. Depending on whether the source of the carbon is fossil or biogenic, the net emissions are 68 g CO₂e per MJ and −4 g CO₂e per MJ respectively. If the marine algae species is used instead of the freshwater species, it offers an additional 16 g CO₂e per MJ carbon fixation in the form of calcium carbonate. The findings point to broadly desirable trends in GHG emissions and costs, while the discussion aims to shed light on areas that could further improve the scalability of the system.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research effort was supported by the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under contracts DE-FE0031914 and DE-FE0032188. The authors thank Dr Lei Hong, Project Manager, Carbon Utilization & Storage Team, Carbon Management Program, DOE. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or re?ect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Thanks are also due to Dr Fangwei Cheng and Dr Hongxi Luo for suggestions pertaining to pyrolysis heat calculations
dc.description.urihttps://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d5se00329f
dc.format.extent12 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2hmqp-mesr
dc.identifier.citationSingh, Udayan, Farah Naaz, Troy R. Hawkins, et al. “Direct Flue Gas Capture for Algae Cultivation and Subsequent Valorization: Evaluating Life Cycle Emissions and Costs.” Sustainable Energy & Fuels 9, no. 16 (2025): 4392–403. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SE00329F.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/D5SE00329F
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/41707
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistry
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Chemistry & Biochemistry Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Department of Marine Biotechnology
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.titleDirect flue gas capture for algae cultivation and subsequent valorization: evaluating life cycle emissions and costs
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-1883

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
d5se00329f.pdf
Size:
979.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
d5se00329f1.pdf
Size:
106.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format