Optical beam spreading in the presence of both atmospheric turbulence and quartic aberration
Files
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Mosavi, N., B. S. Marks, B. G. Boone, and C. R. Menyuk. “Optical Beam Spreading in the Presence of Both Atmospheric Turbulence and Quartic Aberration.” In Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXVI, 8971:17–23. SPIE, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2033561.
Rights
©2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited.
Subjects
UMBC Optical Fiber Communications Laboratory
UMBC High Performance Computing Facility (HPCF)
Aberrations
UMBC High Performance Computing Facility (HPCF)
UMBC Ultrafast Photonics Laboratory
Monte Carlo simulations
Free-space optical communications
UMBC Optical Fiber Communications Laboratory
Atmospheric turbulence
UMBC High Performance Computing Facility (HPCF)
Aberrations
UMBC High Performance Computing Facility (HPCF)
UMBC Ultrafast Photonics Laboratory
Monte Carlo simulations
Free-space optical communications
UMBC Optical Fiber Communications Laboratory
Atmospheric turbulence
Abstract
Optical beam spread and beam quality factor in the presence of both quartic phase aberrations and atmospheric turbulence is numerically analyzed. We obtain analytical expressions for both the mean-square beam radius and the beam quality factor using the moment method, and we compare these expressions to the results from Monte Carlo simulations, which allows us to mutually validate the theory and the Monte Carlo simulation codes. We also discuss the reason for the discrepancy between the classical approach for calculating the ensemble-averaged mean-square beam radius in a turbulent atmosphere that is described by Andrews and Phillips and by Fante versus using the moment method.
