Psychosis-like experiences and resilience: A systematic and critical review of the literature

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDeLuca, Joseph S.
dc.contributor.authorRouhakhtar, Pamela Rakhshan
dc.contributor.authorKlaunig, Mallory
dc.contributor.authorAkouri-Shan, LeeAnn
dc.contributor.authorJay, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorTodd, Therese L.
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Cansu
dc.contributor.authorAndorko, Nicole D.
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Shaynna N.
dc.contributor.authorDobbs, Matthew F.
dc.contributor.authorBilgrami, Zarina R.
dc.contributor.authorKline, Emily
dc.contributor.authorBrodsky, Anne
dc.contributor.authorJespersen, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorLanda, Yulia
dc.contributor.authorCorcoran, Cheryl
dc.contributor.authorSchiffman, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T22:08:19Z
dc.date.available2023-08-23T22:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-28
dc.description.abstractResilience research has documented the ability to cope with traumatic and stressful situations and/or retain functioning given certain risk factors in the context of psychosis. In this study, we conducted the first systematic review of the literature on psychosis-like experiences (PLEs) and resilience. Fifteen articles (from 11 unique study samples) from ten countries were included in this systematic review, with a total of 11,937 unique study participants. Inclusion criteria were broad, capturing a wide range of individuals with PLEs who have not yet experienced threshold psychosis, such as individuals in the general population with elevated self-reports of PLEs, as well as clinical groups diagnosed by clinician interviews (i.e., clinical- or ultra-high-risk for psychosis [CHR or UHR]). For this review, studies needed to include research aims and empirical research related to resilience, and use an established or author-defined measure of psychological and/or social resilience. Data reporting quality was assessed with the STROBE and PROGRESS guidelines. Study aims and measurement of key variables varied widely, and all studies were cross-sectional. In 73% of the studies, resilience was inversely associated with PLEs or psychosis risk status (e.g., CHR or UHR). Results related to specific resilience subscales were mixed. Author-defined resilience was typically related to internal/psychological resources. Future research, particularly longitudinal research involving multidimensional measurement of resilience (e.g., internal and external factors), along with well-defined theoretical models, are necessary before drawing firm conclusions on resilience and PLEs. We propose a dynamic, multifaceted, developmentally-appropriate, and culturally-sensitive model of resilience for future research.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJoseph S. DeLuca’s research is supported by an NIH/NIMH T32 (1T32MH122394–01). Therese L. Todd’s research is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF GRF) Program under Grant No. 1646736. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH/NIMH or NSF.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fser0000585en_US
dc.format.extent31 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.genrepostprintsen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2guis-3aae
dc.identifier.citationDeLuca, J. S., Rakhshan Rouhakhtar, P., Klaunig, M. J., Akouri-Shan, L., Jay, S. Y., Todd, T. L., Sarac, C., Andorko, N. D., Herrera, S. N., Dobbs, M. F., Bilgrami, Z. R., Kline, E., Brodsky, A., Jespersen, R., Landa, Y., Corcoran, C., & Schiffman, J. (2022). Psychosis-like experiences and resilience: A systematic and critical review of the literature. Psychological Services, 19(Suppl 1), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000585en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ser0000585
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/29326
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAPAen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Psychology Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Student Collection
dc.rights©American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000585.en_US
dc.titlePsychosis-like experiences and resilience: A systematic and critical review of the literatureen_US
dc.title.alternativeClinical high risk for psychosis, traumatic experiences, and resilience: A systematic and critical reviewen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-3552en_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9271-3547en_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-5061en_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-8102en_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-505Xen_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-4497en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1890213.pdf
Size:
728.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
NIHMS1890213-supplement-Supplemental_Material_4.zip
Size:
526.13 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

UMBC Psychology Department
UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Student Collection