RELATIVE REPLICATION COMPETENCE OF VIRUS ISOLATES RESISTANT TO ANTI-HIV COMPOUNDS
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Department
Hood College Biology
Program
Biomedical and Environmental Science
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Subjects
Abstract
The rapid selection of drug-resistant strains during antiviral therapy of HIV
infected patients is the primary reason for treatment failure with both nucleoside and
nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. Although
resistance would appear to be detrimental to antiviral therapy, it may be possible to select
for resistant strains with amino acid changes that result in reduced replication capacity of
the virus. Mutations that engender drug resistance may actually handicap the viral
enzymes, reducing the rate and/or extent of virus replication. This reduced rate of virus
replication in a patient may prolong the interval between HIV infection and AIDS and
allow the immune system to more effectively deal with the virus.
We have developed an assay to evaluate and compare the replication kinetics of
molecularly constructed viruses with specific amino acid changes engineered into the
reverse transcriptase and compared the replication of these mutants to the replication of
the wild-type NL4-3 virus. Transfection methodology, cell line, cell density, DNA
concentration, and transfection efficiency were optimized to measure the extent of virus
production. Mutations were chosen for evaluation based on their high frequency of
selection in vitro and/or in vivo as reported in the scientific literature. We were able to
broadly categorize the replication capacity of each virus possessing a single amino acid
change as growing faster, slower, or at an equivalent rate as wild-type virus.
Representative viruses from each category were then evaluated for their growth
potential in the presence of wild-type virus using a dual transfection methodology. These
assays measured relative growth potential of the mutant virus compared to the wild-type
strain both in the absence of and presence of drug selective pressure. Monitoring virus
replication using the dual infection method, rather than from parallel cultures, provided a
more sensitive and relevent approach to differentiating the replication capacity of the
mutant virus compared to wild-type virus.
These results directly demonstrate that drug-induced mutations in the reverse
transcriptase have both positive and negative effects on the ability of HIV to replicate in
human cells. A complete understanding of the effect of each mutation, alone or in
combination, may prove valuable in designing and evaluating therapeutic opportunities
for HIV infected patients.
