MICROSATELLITE TYPING: A RAPID METHOD FOR DETECTING BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT COMPATIBILITY
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
1998
Department
Hood College Biology
Program
Biomedcial and Environmental Science
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Subjects
Abstract
The success of engraftment in bone marrow
transplantation is dependent upon antigen compatibility
between donor and recipient. The gene products of the major
histocompatibility complex, also known as human leukocyte
antigen (HLA), and minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAg)
are recognized by T lymphocytes and are associated with
inducing an immune response. Antigen compatibility is the
primary factor in prevention of graft versus host disease
(GVHD). Traditionally, compatibility between donor and
recipient has been tested by HLA typing using serologic
methods and more recently by molecular methods. Serologic
methods are often not sensitive enough to detect differences
at the HLA loci and molecular methods do not detect relevant
differences outside the HLA region. Where additional
histocompatibility loci may be located, this study examined
the use of microsatellite typing at nine loci, within and
near the HLA region, to determine if it would be a more
accurate and rapid method of detecting compatibility between
related bone marrow donors and recipients. Ninety-two
sibling pairs were typed using both HLA and microsatellite
methods. To determine concordance in matching sibling
pairs, results from the two methods were compared. First, 4
microsatellite markers located between the regions of DQB1
and HLA-A (2700 kb) were compared to HLA data. Second, all
9 microsatellite markers extending from D6S291 (centromeric) to
D6S276 (telomeric) (12-14 MB) were compared to HLA
typing. When microsatellite markers between HLA-A and HLA-DQ
were compared with HLA typing, microsatellite typing was
concordant in 80 cases, while 12 cases showed discordant
results. Microsatellite typing was concordant with HLA in
71 cases, while 21 cases showed discordant results when
microsatellite markers extending from D6S291 to D6S276 were
compared with HLA results. For each sibling pair that was
discordant, the clinical data showed that the engrafted
patients developed GVHD. The data indicated that
microsatellite markers, which cover a greater distance than
HLA alone, were more sensitive in detection of
incompatibilities.
Microsatellite typing is 20% more efficient in
detecting sibling pair mismatches. Microsatellite typing
along with HLA typing is a more sensitive method to detect
HLA associated mismatches than HLA typing alone. This data
supports the use of microsatellite testing before
transplantation to identify discordant alleles between
siblings in the regions flanking the MHC and within the HLA
typed region.