Improving ECC Ozonesonde Data Quality: Assessment of Current Methods and Outstanding Issues
dc.contributor.author | Tarasick, David W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Smit, Herman G. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Anne M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, Gary A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Witte, Jacquelyn C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Davies, Jonathan | |
dc.contributor.author | Nakano, Tatsumi | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Malderen, Roeland | |
dc.contributor.author | Stauffer, Ryan M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Bryan J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stübi, Rene | |
dc.contributor.author | Oltmans, Samuel J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vömel, Holger | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-20T17:31:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-20T17:31:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-20 | |
dc.description.abstract | We review the current state of knowledge of ozonesonde uncertainty and bias, with reference to recent developments in laboratory and field experiments. In the past 20 years ozonesonde precision has improved by a factor of 2, primarily through the adoption of strict standard operating procedures. The uncertainty budget for the ozone partial pressure reading has contributions from stoichiometry, cell background current, pump efficiency and temperature, sensing solution type, and volume. Corrections to historical data for known issues may reduce biases but simultaneously introduce additional uncertainties. This paper describes a systematic approach to quantifying these uncertainties by considering the physical and chemical processes involved and attempts to place our estimates on a firm theoretical or empirical footing. New equations or tables for ozone/iodine conversion efficiency, humidity and temperature corrections to pump flow rate, and altitude-dependent pump flow corrections are presented, as well as detailed discussion of stoichiometry and conversion efficiencies. The nature of the so-called “background current” is considered in detail. Two other factors particularly affecting past measurements, uncertainties and biases in the pressure measurement, and the comparison of sonde profiles to spectrophotometric measurements of total column ozone, are also discussed. Several quality assurance issues remain, but are tractable problems that can be addressed with further research. This will be required if the present goal of better than 5% overall uncertainty throughout the global ozonesonde network is to be achieved. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | The World Calibration Centre for Ozone Sondes (WCCOS) was established by WMO-GAW as part of their quality assurance plan. Since 1996 a number of JOSIE (Juelich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment) campaigns have been conducted at WCCOS to evaluate different ozonesonde types, preparation methods and associated uncertainties. We wish to acknowledge a number of individuals for their foresight and support in establishing JOSIE as a unique facility for ozonesonde quality assurance: Volker Mohnen, John Miller, Michael Proffitt, Len Barrie, and Dieter Kley. We also thank Manfred Helten and many other people involved in the JOSIE campaigns for their generous support and fruitful discussions. JOSIE has been sponsored by WMO/GAW, QA/SAC-Germany and Forschungszentrum Juelich. We are also grateful to three anonymous referees for many helpful comments and suggestions with this manuscript. | |
dc.description.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019EA000914 | |
dc.format.extent | 27 pages | |
dc.genre | journal articles | |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m2qmz6-4rv2 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tarasick, David W., Herman G. J. Smit, Anne M. Thompson, Gary A. Morris, Jacquelyn C. Witte, Jonathan Davies, Tatsumi Nakano, et al. “Improving ECC Ozonesonde Data Quality: Assessment of Current Methods and Outstanding Issues.” Earth and Space Science 8, no. 3 (2021): e2019EA000914. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000914. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000914 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/34696 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | AGU | |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Faculty Collection | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC GESTAR II | |
dc.rights | This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law. | |
dc.rights | Public Domain | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | data quality | |
dc.subject | ozonesonde | |
dc.subject | trends | |
dc.subject | uncertainty | |
dc.subject | validation | |
dc.title | Improving ECC Ozonesonde Data Quality: Assessment of Current Methods and Outstanding Issues | |
dc.type | Text | |
dcterms.creator | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-0920 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
- Name:
- EarthandSpaceScience2021TarasickImprovingECCOzonesondeDataQualityAssessmentofCurrentMethodsand.pdf
- Size:
- 2.82 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- 2019ea000914sup0001supportinginformationsis01.docx
- Size:
- 120.62 KB
- Format:
- Microsoft Word XML