THE USE OF RACIST AND NATIVIST ARGUMENTS IN THE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT: 1890-1920
dc.contributor.author | Ehrlich, Kate Aileen | |
dc.contributor.department | Hood College Arts and Humanities | |
dc.contributor.program | Humanities | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-22T13:13:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-22T13:13:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the evolution and significance of racist and nativist arguments throughout the women's suffrage movement. Particular focus is given to the period between 1890 and 1920, when the movement gained momentum following the creation of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) and the formation of an active women's rights movement in the South. It is the actions of suffrage leaders, pertaining to their use of racist and nativist arguments, and the motivations behind the adoption and widespread use of these arguments within the context of American politics which is of primary concern. | |
dc.format.extent | 96 pages | |
dc.genre | Capstone | |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m21pqs-mr0d | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/36684 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.title | THE USE OF RACIST AND NATIVIST ARGUMENTS IN THE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT: 1890-1920 | |
dc.type | Text |