Patient-reported barriers to prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: A mixed-methods study
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Woo, Joyce L., Shelvonne Burton, Tara Iyengar, Adithya Sivakumar, Sarah Spiewak, Renee Wakulski, William A. Grobman, et al. “Patient-Reported Barriers to Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Defects: A Mixed-Methods Study.” Prenatal Diagnosis n/a, no. n/a. Accessed January 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6481.
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Subjects
Abstract
Objective
To ascertain patient-reported, modifiable barriers to prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects (CHDs).
Methods
This was a mixed-methods study among caretakers of infants who received congenital heart surgery from 2019 to 2020 in the Chicagoland area. Quantitative variables measuring sociodemographic characteristics and prenatal care utilization, and qualitative data pertaining to patient-reported barriers to prenatal diagnosis were collected from electronic health records and semi-structured phone surveys. Thematic analysis was performed using a convergent parallel approach.
Results
In total, 160 caretakers completed the survey, 438 were eligible for survey, and 49 (31%) received prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. When comparing respondents and non-respondents, there was a lower prevalence of maternal Hispanic ethnicity and a higher prevalence of non-English/Spanish-speaking households. Of all respondents, 34% reported an undetected CHD on ultrasound or echocardiogram, while 79% reported at least one barrier to prenatal diagnosis related to social determinants of health. Among those social barriers, the most common were difficulty with appointment scheduling (n = 12, 9.5%), far distance to care/lack of access to transportation (n = 12, 9.5%) and difficulty getting time off work to attend appointments (n = 6, 4.8%). The latter two barriers were correlated.
Conclusion
While technical improvements in the detection of CHDs remain an important area of research, it is equally critical to produce evidence for interventions that mitigate barriers to prenatal diagnosis due to social determinants of health.
